at least on the issue of global warming. They attribute the increasingly divergent views on this issue to “party sorting” — that is,
cheap wholesale jordans
, people choosing a party on the basis of its general views on this issue,
cheap retro jordans
, or people within a party increasingly assuming the views on this issue that are espoused by leaders of their party.
Dunlap and McCright find that the tight correlation between party affiliation and attitudes about climate hold even after accounting statistically for other potentially confounding demographic factors such as gender, age, race,
cheap jordans free shipping
, income and education. Moreover,
cheap jordans online
, they observe,
cheap jordan shoes
, throughout the past decade,
cheap real jordans
, “Republicans and Democrats who believe they understand global warming reasonably well [have been holding] more divergent views compared with their presumably less-informed counterparts.”
The bottom line: Democrats’ views have tended to reflect the scientific assessments on climate change at the same time that Republicans have tended to dismiss the scientific assessments,
cheap jordans for sale
.
This doesn’t bode well for the possibility that Republicans in Congress, the Statehouse or even the White House would base future environmental policies on sound science. At least not if they decide that science is discretionary — something to embrace only if it jibes with some preexisting objectives.
Both Senators John McCain and Barack Obama have argued that they believe the planet is warming, that human activities have played a large role in this,
http://cheapjordansstock.com
, and that our way of life is in peril if we don’t quickly move away from deriving most of our energy from

http://www.midwestartfairs.com/node/add/article

http://www.kiteaway.co...topic.php?f=1&t=73482

http://goodgameteam.cb...c&topic=83&page=1