| Main Board • (no title) |
| 22.02.2017, 11:20 - nieeshoes - Rank 6 - 1159 Posts
and other members of the group who conducted the original replication study (SN: 10/3/15, p. 8) reject Gilbert’s analysis. The 2015 report provides “initial, cheap jordans free shipping , not definitive evidence” that psychology has a reproducibility problem, cheap jordans online , they write in a response published in the same issue of Science, cheap wholesale jordans . Strikingly, “the very best scientists cannot really agree on what the results of the most important paper in the recent history of psychology mean, cheap real jordans ,” says Stanford University epidemiologist John Ioannidis. Researchers’ assumptions and expectations can influence their take on any results, cheap jordan shoes , “no matter how clear and strong they are.” Many repeat studies in the 2015 paper differed dramatically from initial studies, stacking the deck against achieving successful replications, http://cheapjordansstock.com , Gilbert says. Replications often sampled different populations, cheap air jordans , such as substituting native Italians for Americans in a study of attitudes toward black Americans. Many altered procedures. One replication effort gave older children the relatively easy task of locating items on a small computer screen, cheap jordans for sale , whereas the original study gave younger children a harder task of locating items on a large computer screen. Repeat studies also generally included too few volunteers to make a statistically compelling case that a replication had succeeded or failed, Gilbert says. Another problem was that each original study http://www13.plala.or....ite_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi http://siemprelucenacf...p;view=article&id=115 http://al-inshad.com/v...re-Cheapjordansstock-c-om |