Ongoing AML Monitoring

[FrankFr]

I’m interested in how continuous aml screening and monitoring should be organized in practice, especially beyond initial onboarding. It seems challenging to balance real risk detection with operational efficiency. How do experienced professionals structure monitoring so it stays reliable without becoming unmanageable?
_________________
https://residence-estate.ge/he/

[SemMM]

In my experience working across multiple regulated industries, I’ve found that the effectiveness of any compliance program hinges on how well it can conduct aml screening and monitoring without overwhelming staff with false alerts or cumbersome processes. Early in my career, we relied on manual lists and outdated software that generated countless irrelevant alerts, making it difficult to focus on genuine risk. When I moved to a role that allowed us to implement a more advanced automated screening solution, everything changed. The system automatically scanned entities against vast global databases for sanctions lists, politically exposed persons, and adverse media, instantly flagging high‑risk profiles for deeper review. Even more valuable was its ongoing monitoring capability, which tracked changes over time and informed us in real time of any new risk factors. This meant I could trust that the compliance team wasn’t just checking boxes during onboarding, but continuously safeguarding against financial crime throughout the entire customer lifecycle. With smart filtering reducing false positives and AI‑assisted risk scoring helping prioritize investigations, I saw both accuracy and efficiency improve dramatically. As a result, we were able to demonstrate to auditors and regulators that our AML framework was proactive, thorough, and built to adapt to new threats without manual overhead.