Table of Contents
Previous Section Next Section

Pentium III Katmai 600B

Table 6-54: Pentium III Katmai 450 Specifications

Processor Family

Model Name

Intel Pentium III Katmai


 

Performance Rating

600 MHz

 

Front-side Bus Speed

133 MHz

 

Multiplier Ratio

4.5×

Physical Design

Interface Packing

242-Pin Slot 1 Cartridge

 

Core Voltage

2.05 volts

 

Power Consumption

23 watts

 

Maximum Power

34.5 watts

Table 6-55: Pentium III Katmai 450 Overclocking

Pentium III Katmai

Model Rating

600 MHz


Overclocking Potential

Multiplier Lock Support

Locked Multiplier

 

Typical Multiplier O/C

N/A

 

Typical Front-side Bus O/C

~ 140 MHz

 

Typical O/C Potential

630 – 650 MHz

 

Maximum O/C Potential

675+ MHz

Overclocking Tolerances

Recommended Cooling Type

Forced-Air Heatsink

 

Recommended Heatsink Coolers

Globalwin VES20

  

Alpha P3125

 

Recommended Peltier Active Cooler

Swiftech MC1000

  

PC-10a Cooler

 

Maximum Core Voltage

2.2 volts with Heatsink Cooler

 

Maximum I/O Voltage

3.5 volts with Chipset Cooler

 

Maximum Core Temperature

80 – 85° Celsius

Strategy

The Pentium III Katmai 600B offers overclocking potential similar to its 533-MHz counterpart. Notice the increase to 2.05 volts for the core voltage rating compared to 2.0 volts for older Katmai models. Intel must have recognized the limitations of its .25-micron fabrication process. A 0.05 volt increase appears minimal, but the reality is that Intel needed the bump in voltage to sustain its sales model at this higher frequency.

The Katmai 600B marked the end of a generation. It was the last .25-micron processor offered by Intel's desktop computing division. Overclocking this model proves difficult beyond 650 MHz; many chips never reach beyond the factory default of 600 MHz at a 2.05 volts core. Due to a peak power demand of 34.5 watts, the Katmai 600B will require massive cooling if overclocking returns exceeding 650 MHz are to be attained. Peltier cooling is a popular solution for this model, but the costs can be prohibitive given the small potential performance gains.


Table of Contents
Previous Section Next Section