at least on the issue of global warming. They attribute the increasingly divergent views on this issue to “party sorting” — that is, people choosing a party on the basis of its general views on this issue,
cheap Authentic jordans
, or people within a party increasingly assuming the views on this issue that are espoused by leaders of their party.
Dunlap and McCright find that the tight correlation between party affiliation and attitudes about climate hold even after accounting statistically for other potentially confounding demographic factors such as gender, age,
cheap retro jordans
, race,
cheap jordans
, income and education. Moreover,
cheap air jordans
, they observe,
cheap real jordans
, throughout the past decade, “Republicans and Democrats who believe they understand global warming reasonably well [have been holding] more divergent views compared with their presumably less-informed counterparts.”
The bottom line: Democrats’ views have tended to reflect the scientific assessments on climate change at the same time that Republicans have tended to dismiss the scientific assessments.
This doesn’t bode well for the possibility that Republicans in Congress,
cheap jordans online
, the Statehouse or even the White House would base future environmental policies on sound science. At least not if they decide that science is discretionary — something to embrace only if it jibes with some preexisting objectives.
Both Senators John McCain and Barack Obama have argued that they believe the planet is warming,
http://cheapjordansstock.com
, that human activities have played a large role in this,
cheap jordan shoes
, and that our way of life is in peril if we don’t quickly move away from deriving most of our energy from

http://worldofbitcoin....12067.msg321526#msg321526

http://worldofbitcoin....13408.msg372814#msg372814

http://www.arcobonsai....opic.php?f=1&t=204185