When Christian Agrillo runs number-related experiments in his lab,
cheap Authentic jordans
, he wishes his undergraduate subjects good luck. For certain tests, that’s about all he says. Giving instructions to the people would be unfair to the fish.
Agrillo, of the University of Padua in Italy, is finishing up several years of pitting humans against fish in trials of their abilities to compare quantities. He can’t, of course, tell his angelfish or his guppies to choose,
cheap jordan shoes
, say,
cheap jordans online
, the larger array of dots. So in recent tests he made the bemused students use trial and error too.
“At the end, they start laughing when they find they are compared with fish,” he says. Yet the fish versus humans face-offs are eye-opening comparisons in his search for the deep evolutionary basis of what has blossomed into human mathematics. If it turns out that fish and people share some idiosyncrasies of their number sense (like spidey sense,
cheap jordans free shipping
, except focused on quantities rather than danger), those elements might in theory date from a common ancestor more than 400 million years old. Comparisons of animals’ mental powers are “the paleontology of cognition,
http://cheapjordansstock.com
,” Agrillo says.
No one seriously argues that animals other than people have some kind of symbolic numeral system,
cheap jordans for sale
, but nonhuman animals?—?a lot of them?—?can manage almost-math without numbers.
“There’s been an explosion of studies,” Agrillo says. Reports of a quantity-related ability come from chickens,
cheap retro jordans
, horses, dogs, honeybees, spiders,
cheap air jordans
,

http://bjaeldemosegaar...hread.php?thread_id=22301

http://forum.drimmi.ru...4&p=603922#post603922

http://www13.plala.or....ite_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi