standards for scientific integrity,
cheap Authentic jordans
, for rigorous methods, do not reside with the institutions or the funders or the journals. Those standards are within the scientists themselves. The inmates really do run the scientific asylum.
This is not an inherently bad thing. Science needs people with appropriate expertise to read the highly specialized stuff. But it does mean that a movement for culture change needs to come from within the scientific enterprise itself. “This is more likely to happen if you have a grassroots movement where lots of scientists are convinced and are used to performing research in a given way,
cheap air jordans
, leading to more reliable results,
cheap jordan shoes
,” Ioannidis says.
What produces more reliable research,
cheap jordans online
, though,
cheap real jordans
, still requires … research. “I think these are questions that could be addressed with scientific studies,
http://cheapjordansstock.com
,” Ioannidis says. “This is where I’m interested in taking the research, to get studies that are telling us to [do science] this way,
cheap jordans
, [or] this type of leadership is better…. You can test policies.” Science needs more studies of science. ?
The first step is admitting that problems exist in the current structure. “We’re bought into it ?— we invested our whole career into the game as it exists,” Edwards says. “We are taught to be cowards when it comes to addressing these issues,
cheap jordans free shipping
, because the personal and professional costs of revealing these problems is so high.” It can be painful to see sloppy science exposed. Especially when that science is performed by colleagues and friends.? But Edwards says fixing the system will be worth the pain. “I don’t

http://users.atw.hu/te...orum_topic&topic=7619

http://www.nanicvlasy.sk/search/node/

http://lakickers.myome...orum_topic&topic=2800