| Main Board • Cheap Jordan Shoes 50% OFF Sale Store|Cheapjordan |
| 19.02.2017, 11:26 - nieeshoes - Rank 6 - 1073 Posts
of Michigan colleague Justin Wolfers have been making the case that predicting the political future may come down to one simple question, cheap real jordans . It’s not the poll response typically reported over and over during an election cycle. Since the 1930s, cheap retro jordans , pollsters have been developing their forecasts primarily by asking one thing: If the election were held today, cheap jordans , who would you vote for? If the sample is both large and representative, this “intention” question can work. It’s also tidy, cheap air jordans , as Rothschild explained at this year’s New Horizons in Science meeting in Raleigh, N.C. The raw numbers alone — X percent for Obama, Y percent for Romney — tell the story. But the intention question gets at who a person would vote for today, which can be misleading the farther you are from the election. Incumbents, cheap jordans online , for example, tend to look worse in polls taken around Labor Day than on Election Day, http://cheapjordansstock.com , notes Rothschild. If pollsters are going to rely on a single question, it should not be about voter intentions, cheap wholesale jordans , Rothschild and Wolfers argue in a recent National Bureau of Economic Research working paper. Pollsters should ask about expectations: Who do you think will win the election? While the classic intention question reveals one data point — who the person being questioned plans to vote for — the answer to the expectation question is far richer. In addition to indicating how the person being questioned will vote, cheap Authentic jordans , that data point also incorporates information on how that person’s friends and family will vote. The answer may even encode how polled people and their social http://www.skill-proje...rum_topic&topic=15141 http://bjaeldemosegaar...hread.php?thread_id=22951 http://olivier.michelon.me/blog/?q=search/node/ |