| Main Board • http://cheapjordansstock.com Store - CheapJordansS |
| 06.03.2017, 12:24 - nieeshoes - Rank 6 - 1073 Posts
to be successful in science? A scientist gets a job and funding by publishing a lot of high-impact papers with novel findings. Those papers and findings beget awards and funding to do more science — and publish more papers. “The problem that we face is that the incentive system is focused almost entirely on getting research published, http://cheapjordansstock.com , rather than on getting research right,” says Brian Nosek, cheap retro jordans , a psychologist at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. This idea of success has become so ingrained that scientists are even introduced when they give talks by the number of papers they have published or the amount of grant funding they have, cheap jordan shoes , says Marc Edwards, cheap air jordans , a civil engineer at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg. But rewarding researchers for the number of papers they publish results in a “natural selection” of sloppy science, cheap jordans free shipping , new research shows. The idea of scientific “success” equated as number of publications promotes not just lazy science but also unethical science, another paper argues. Both articles proclaim that it’s time for a culture shift. But with many scientific labs to fund and little money to do it, cheap Authentic jordans , what does a new, better scientific enterprise look like? As young scientists apply for tenure-track academic jobs, cheap real jordans , they may bring an application filled with tens to dozens of papers. ?Hiring committees can often no longer read or evaluate all of them. So they may come to use numbers as shorthand — numbers of papers published, cheap jordans online , how many times those papers have been cited and whether the journals the papers are http://users.atw.hu/co...amp;topic=8924&page=1 http://www.prostroy.by/search/node/ http://www.siempreluce...p;view=article&id=115 |