| Main Board • cheap air jordans Store - CheapJordansStock |
| 06.03.2017, 13:22 - anyoshoes - Rank 6 - 1072 Posts
standards for scientific integrity, cheap real jordans , for rigorous methods, cheap jordans , do not reside with the institutions or the funders or the journals. Those standards are within the scientists themselves. The inmates really do run the scientific asylum. This is not an inherently bad thing. Science needs people with appropriate expertise to read the highly specialized stuff. But it does mean that a movement for culture change needs to come from within the scientific enterprise itself. “This is more likely to happen if you have a grassroots movement where lots of scientists are convinced and are used to performing research in a given way, cheap jordan shoes , leading to more reliable results, cheap wholesale jordans ,” Ioannidis says. What produces more reliable research, http://cheapjordansstock.com , though, still requires … research. “I think these are questions that could be addressed with scientific studies,” Ioannidis says. “This is where I’m interested in taking the research, cheap retro jordans , to get studies that are telling us to [do science] this way, [or] this type of leadership is better…. You can test policies.” Science needs more studies of science. ? The first step is admitting that problems exist in the current structure. “We’re bought into it ?— we invested our whole career into the game as it exists, cheap air jordans ,” Edwards says. “We are taught to be cowards when it comes to addressing these issues, cheap jordans online , because the personal and professional costs of revealing these problems is so high.” It can be painful to see sloppy science exposed. Especially when that science is performed by colleagues and friends.? But Edwards says fixing the system will be worth the pain. “I don’t http://www.markpreston.../dp/node/2#comment-437334 http://siemprelucenacf...p;view=article&id=115 http://www.frbiz.com/p...7/ipad_cover_cgi_005.html |