prefatory and introductory) that ND is beyond recovery.It seems to me to be written by a professor who loves ND very much, and would not see the currently surging forces of radical secularism permanently achieve the high ground, and therefore the upper hand, in the ongoing debate.Said simply: with his book, Prof. Rice is in the fight, and taking big licks, while you are citing his book as though it were the final address of a defeated general to his corps.Let it be clear: when I say that ND is not beyond redemption, I do not mean to say I think everything at ND is <a href="
esglmjbk.com">hudeyk-norey.Best,C.</a>