The
Sooty Tern is highly aerial and marine and will
spend years flying at sea without returning to
land. (Olsen and Larsson, Terns of Europe and
North America ISBN 0-7136-4056-1)
Seabirds are
birds that have adapted to life in the marine
environment. Whilst seabirds vary greatly in lifestyle,
behaviour and physiology, they often exhibit striking
convergent evolution, as the same environmental problems and
feeding niches have resulted in similar adaptations. The
first seabirds evolved in the Cretaceous, and modern seabird
families emerged in the Paleogene.
Seabirds live longer, breed later and have fewer young
than other birds do, but they invest a great deal of time in
those young that they do have. Most species nest in
colonies, which can vary in size from a few dozen birds
to many millions. They are famous for undertaking long
annual
migrations, crossing the
equator or circumnavigating the Earth in some cases. They
feed both at the ocean's surface and below it, and even feed
on each other. Seabirds can be highly pelagic, coastal, or in some cases spend a part of the
year away from the sea entirely.
Seabirds and humans have a long history together: they
have provided food to hunters, guided fishermen to fishing
stocks and led sailors to land. Many species are currently
threatened by human activities, and conservation efforts are underway.
There exists no one definition of which groups, families
and species are seabirds, and most definitions are in some
way arbitrary. In the words of two seabird scientists, "The
one common characteristic that all seabirds share is that
they feed in saltwater; but, as seems to be true with any
statement in biology, some do not."[1]
However, by convention all of the
penguins and
procellariiformes, all of the Pelecaniformes except the
darters, and some of the Charadriiformes (the skuas, gulls,
terns, auks and skimmers) are classified as seabirds. The
phalaropes are usually included as well, since although they
are waders ("shorebirds" in North America), two of the three
species are oceanic for nine months of the year, crossing
the equator to feed pelagically.
Loons and
grebes, which nest on lakes but winter at sea, are
usually categorised as water birds, not seabirds. Although
there are a number of
sea ducks in the family Anatidae which are truly
marine in the winter, by convention they are usually
excluded from the seabird grouping. Many waders (or
shorebirds) and
herons are also highly marine, living on the sea's edge,
but are also not treated as seabirds.
Evolution and fossil record
Seabirds, by virtue of living in a
geologically depositional environment (that is, in the sea
where sediments are readily laid down), are well represented
in the fossil record.[1] They are first known to occur in
the Cretaceous era, the earliest being the
Hesperornithiformes, like Hesperornis regalis, a flightless
loon-like seabird that dove in a similar fashion to
grebes and loons (using its feet to move underwater)[2]
but had a beak filled with sharp teeth.[3]
The Cretaceous seabird Hesperornis
While Hesperornis is not thought to have left
descendants, the earliest extant seabirds also occurred in
the Cretaceous, with a species called Tytthostonyx
glauconiticus, which has been placed in the
Procellariiformes. In the Paleogene the seas were dominated
by early Procellariidae, giant penguins and two extinct
families, the Pelagornithidae and the Plotopteridae (a group
of large seabirds that looked like the penguins).[4] Modern
genera began their wide radiation in the Miocene, although
the genus Puffinus (which includes today's Manx Shearwater
and Sooty Shearwater) dates back to the Oligocene.[1] The
highest diversity of seabirds apparently existed during the
Late Miocene and the Pliocene. At the end of the latter, the
oceanic food web had undergone a period of upheaval due to
extinction of considerable numbers of marine species;[5]
subsequently, the spread of marine mammals seems to have
prevented seabirds from reaching their erstwhile diversity.[6]
Characteristics
Adaptations to life at sea
Seabirds have made numerous adaptations to living on and
feeding in the sea. Wing morphology has been shaped by the
niche an individual species or family has evolved, so that
looking at a wing's shape and loading can tell a scientist
about its life feeding behaviour. Longer wings and low wing
loading are typical of more pelagic species, whilst diving
species have shorter wings.[7] Species such as the Wandering
Albatross, which forage over huge areas of sea, have a
reduced capacity for powered flight and are dependent on a
type of gliding called dynamic soaring (where the wind
deflected by waves provides lift) as well as slope
soaring.[8] Seabirds also almost always have webbed feet, to
aid movement on the surface as well as assisting diving in
some species. The Procellariiformes are unusual amongst
birds in having a strong sense of smell (olfaction), which is used to find widely
distributed food in a vast ocean,[9]
and possibly to locate their colonies.
Salt glands are used by seabirds to deal with the salt they
ingest by drinking and feeding (particularly on
crustaceans), and to help them osmoregulate.[10] The
excretions from these glands (which are positioned in the
head of the birds, emerging from the nasal cavity) are
almost pure NaCl.
Cormorants, like this Double-crested Cormorant,
have plumage which is partly wettable, allowing
them to dive without fighting buoyancy.
With the exception of the
cormorants and some terns, and in common with most other
birds, all seabirds have waterproof
plumage. However, compared to land birds, they have far
more feathers protecting their bodies. This dense plumage is
better able to protect the bird from getting wet, and cold
is kept out by a dense layer of
down feathers. The cormorants possess a layer of unique
feathers that retain a smaller layer of air (compared to
other diving birds) but otherwise soak up water.[11] This
allows them to swim without fighting the buoyancy that retaining air in the feathers causes, yet
retain enough air to prevent the bird losing excessive heat
through contact with water.
The plumage of most seabirds is less colourful than that
of land birds, restricted in the main to variations of
black, white or grey.[7]
A few species sport colourful plumes (such as the
tropicbirds or some penguins), but most of the colour in
seabirds appears in the bills and legs. The plumage of
seabirds is thought in many cases to be for camouflage, both
defensive (the colour of US Navy battleships is the same as
that of Antarctic Prions,[7]
and in both cases it reduces visibility at sea) and
aggressive (the white underside possessed by many seabirds
helps hide them from prey below).
Diet and feeding
Seabirds evolved to exploit different food resources in
the world's seas and oceans, and to a great extent, their
physiology and behaviour have been shaped by their diet.
These evolutionary forces have often caused species in
different families and even orders to evolve similar
strategies and adaptations to the same problems, leading to
remarkable convergent evolution, such as that between
auks
and
penguins. There are four basic feeding strategies, or
ecological guilds, for feeding at sea: surface feeding,
pursuit diving, plunge diving, and predation of higher
vertebrates; within these guilds there are multiple
variations on the theme.
Surface feeding
Many seabirds feed on the ocean's surface, as the action
of marine
currents often concentrates food such as krill,
fish,
squid or other prey items within reach of a dipped head.
Wilson's Storm Petrels pattering on the
water's surface.
Surface feeding itself can be broken up into two
different approaches, surface feeding while
flying (for example as practiced by
gadfly petrels,
frigate-birds and storm-petrels), and surface feeding whilst
swimming (examples of which are practiced by fulmars, gulls,
many of the shearwaters and gadfly petrels). Surface feeders
in flight include some of the most acrobatic of seabirds,
which either snatch morsels from the water (as do
frigate-birds and some terns), or "walk", pattering and
hovering on the water's surface, as some of the
storm-petrels do.[12] Many of these do not ever land in the
water, and some, such as the frigatebirds, have difficulty
getting airborne again should they do so.[13] Another
seabird family that does not land while feeding is the
skimmer, which has a unique fishing method: flying along
the surface with the lower mandible in the water—this shuts
automatically when the bill touches something in the water.
The skimmer's bill reflects its unusual lifestyle, with the
lower mandible uniquely being longer than the upper one.
Surface feeders that swim often have unique bills as
well, adapted for their specific prey. Prions have special
bills with filters called lamellae to filter out plankton from mouthfuls of water,[14]
and many albatrosses and petrels have hooked bills to snatch
fast-moving prey. Gulls have more generalised bills that
reflect their more opportunistic lifestyle.
Pursuit diving
The Chinstrap Penguin is a highly streamlined
pursuit diver.
Pursuit diving exerts greater pressures (both
evolutionary and physiological) on seabirds, but the reward
is a greater area in which to feed than is available to
surface feeders. Propulsion underwater can be provided by
wings (as used by penguins, auks, diving petrels, and some
other species of petrel) or feet (as used by cormorants,
grebes, divers and several types of fish-eating ducks).
Wing-propelled divers are generally faster than
foot-propelled divers.[1] In both cases the use of wings or
feet for diving has limited their utility in other
situations: divers and grebes walk with extreme difficulty
(if at all), penguins cannot fly, and auks have sacrificed
flight efficiency in favour of underwater diving. For
example, the razorbill (an Atlantic auk) requires 64% more
energy to fly than a petrel of equivalent size.[15] Many
shearwaters are intermediate between the two, having longer
wings than typical wing-propelled divers but heavier wing
loadings than the other surface-feeding procellariids,
leaving them capable of diving to considerable depths while
still being efficient long-distance travellers. The most
impressive diving exhibited by shearwaters is found in the
Short-tailed Shearwater, which has been recorded diving
below 70 m.[16] Some albatross species are also capable of
some limited diving, with Light-mantled Sooty Albatrosses holding the record at
12 m.[17]
Of all the wing-propelled pursuit divers, the most efficient
in the air are the albatrosses, and it is no coincidence
that they are the poorest divers. This is the dominant guild
in polar and subpolar environments, as it is energetically
inefficient in warmer waters. With their poor flying
ability, many wing-propelled pursuit divers are more limited
in their foraging range than other guilds, especially during
the breeding season when hungry chicks need regular feeding.
Plunge diving
Gannets,
boobies, tropicbirds, some
terns and
Brown Pelicans all engage in plunge diving, taking fast
moving prey by diving into the water from flight. Plunge
diving allows birds to use the energy from the momentum of
the dive to combat natural buoyancy (caused by air trapped
in
plumage),[18]
and thus uses less energy than the dedicated pursuit divers,
allowing them utilise more widely distributed food
resources, for example, in impoverished tropical seas. In
general, this is the most specialised method of hunting
employed by seabirds; other non-specialists (such as gulls
and skuas) may employ it but do so with less skill and from
lower heights. In Brown Pelicans the skills of plunge diving
take several years to fully develop—once mature, they can
dive from 20 m (70 ft) above the water's surface, shifting
the body before impact to avoid injury.[19] It has been
suggested that plunge divers are restricted in their hunting
grounds to clear waters that afford a view of their prey
from the air,[20] and while they are the dominant guild in
the tropics, the link between plunge diving and water
clarity is inconclusive.[21] Some plunge divers (as well as
some surface feeders) are dependent on dolphins and tuna to push shoaling fish up towards the surface.[22]
Kleptoparasitism, scavenging and
predation
Some seabirds, like this South Polar Skua, will
take the eggs of other birds. This skua is
attempting to push an Adelie Penguin off its
nest.
This catch-all category refers to other seabird
strategies that involve the next
trophic level up. Kleptoparasites are seabirds that make a
part of their living stealing food of other seabirds. Most
famously, frigate-birds and skuas engage in this behaviour,
although gulls, terns and other species will steal food
opportunistically.[23] The nocturnal nesting behaviour of
some seabirds has been interpreted as arising due to
pressure from this aerial piracy.[24] Kleptoparasitsim is
not thought to play a significant part of the diet of any
species, and is instead a supplement to food obtained by
hunting.[1] A study of Great Frigatebirds stealing from
Masked Boobies estimated that the frigatebirds could at most
obtain 40% of the food they needed, and on average obtained
only 5%.[25] Many species of gull will feed on seabird and
sea mammal carrion when the opportunity arises, as will
giant petrels. Some species of albatross also engage in
scavenging: an analysis of regurgitated squid beaks has shown that many of the squid eaten are
too large to have been caught alive, and include mid-water
species likely to be beyond the reach of albatrosses.[26]
Some species will also feed on other seabirds; for example,
gulls, skuas and giant petrels will often take eggs, chicks
and even small seabirds from nesting colonies.
[27]
Life history
Seabirds' life histories are dramatically different from
those of land birds. In general, they are K-selected, live
much longer (anywhere between 20 and 60 years), they delay
breeding for longer (for up to 10 years), and invest more
effort into fewer young.[1][28] Most species will only have
one clutch a year, unless they lose the first (with a few
exceptions, like the Cassin's Auklet),[29] and many species
(like the tubenoses and
sulids), only one egg a year.[14]
Northern Gannet pair "billing" during
courtship. Like all seabirds except the
phalaropes they maintain a pair bond throughout
the breeding season.
Care of young is protracted, extending for as long as six
months, among the longest for birds. For example, once
Common Guillemot chicks fledge, they remain with the male parent for several
months at sea.[15]
The
frigatebirds have the longest period of parental care of
any bird, with the chicks fledging after four to six months
and with continued assistance after that for up to 14
months.[30]
Due to the extended period of care, breeding occurs every
two years rather than annually for some species. This
life-history strategy has probably evolved both in response
to the challenges of living at sea (collecting widely
scattered prey items), the frequency of breeding failures
due to unfavourable marine conditions, and the relative lack
of predation compared to that of land-living birds.[1]
Because of the greater investment in raising the young
and because foraging for food may occur far from the nest
site, in all seabird species except the phalaropes, both
parents participate in caring for the young, and pairs are
typically at least seasonally monogamous. Many species, such
as gulls, auks and penguins, retain the same mate for
several seasons, and many
petrel species mate for life.[14]
The albatrosses and
procellariids which mate for life can take many years to
form a pair bond before they breed, and the albatrosses have
an elaborate breeding dance that is part of pair-bond
formation.[31]
Breeding and colonies
Common Murres breed on densely packed colonies
on offshore rocks, islands and cliffs.
Ninety-five per cent of seabirds are colonial,[1]
and seabird colonies are amongst the largest bird colonies
in the world, providing one of Earth's great wildlife
spectacles. Colonies of over a million birds have been
recorded, both in the
tropics (such as Kiritimati in the Pacific) and in the polar
latitudes (as in Antarctica). Seabird colonies occur exclusively for the
purpose of breeding; non-breeding birds will only collect
together outside the breeding season in areas where prey
species are densely aggregated.
Seabird colonies are highly variable. Individual nesting
sites can be widely spaced, as in an albatross colony, or
densely packed as with a murre colony. In most seabird
colonies, several different species will nest on the same
colony, often exhibiting some niche separation. Seabirds can
nest in trees (if any are available), on the ground (with or
without nests), on cliffs, in burrows under the ground and
in rocky crevices. Competition can be strong both within
species and between species, with aggressive species such as
Sooty Terns pushing less dominant species out of the most
desirable nesting spaces.[32] The tropical Bonin Petrel
nests during the winter to avoid competition with the more
aggressive Wedge-tailed Shearwater. When the seasons overlap, the
Wedge-tailed Shearwaters will kill young Bonin Petrels in
order to use their burrows.[33]
Many seabirds show remarkable site fidelity, returning to
the same burrow, nest or site for many years, and they will
defend that site from rivals with great vigour.[1] This
increases breeding success, provides a place for returning
mates to reunite, and reduces the costs of prospecting for a
new site.[34] Young adults breeding for the first time
usually return to their natal colony, and often nest close
to where they hatched. This tendency, known as philopatry,
is so strong that a study of Laysan Albatrosses found that
the average distance between hatching site and the site
where a bird established its own territory was 22 m;[35]
another study, this time on Cory's Shearwaters nesting near
Corsica, found that of nine out of 61 male chicks that
returned to breed at their natal colony bred in the burrow
they were raised in, and two actually bred with their own
mother.[36]
Colonies are usually situated on islands, cliffs or
headlands which land mammals have difficulty accessing.[37]
This is thought to provide protection to seabirds, which are
often very clumsy on land. Coloniality often arises in types
of bird which do not defend feeding territories (such as
swifts, which have a very variable prey source); this may be
a reason why it arises more frequently in seabirds.[1] There
are other possible advantages: colonies may act as
information centres, where seabirds returning to the sea to
forage can find out where prey is by studying returning
individuals of the same species. There are disadvantages to
colonial life, particularly the spread of disease. Colonies
also attract the attention of predators, principally other
birds, and many species attend their colonies nocturnally to avoid predation.[38]
Migration
Arctic Terns breed in the arctic and subarctic
and winter in Antarctica.
Like many birds, seabirds often
migrate after the breeding season. Of these, the trip
taken by the Arctic Tern is the farthest of any bird,
crossing the equator in order to spend the Austral summer in
Antarctica. Other species also undertake trans-equatorial
trips, both from the north to the south, and from south to
north. The population of Elegant Terns, which nest off Baja
California, splits after the breeding season with some birds
travelling north to the coast of central California and some
travelling as far south as Peru and Chile to feed in the
Humboldt Current.[39] The Sooty Shearwater undertakes an
annual migration cycle that rivals that of the Arctic Tern;
birds that nest in New Zealand and Chile and spend the
northern summer feeding in the North Pacific off Japan,
Alaska and California, an annual round trip of
40,000 miles (64,000 km).[40]
Other species also migrate shorter distances away from
the breeding sites, their distribution at sea determined by
the availability of food. If oceanic conditions are
unsuitable, seabirds will emigrate to more productive areas,
sometimes permanently if the bird is young.[41]
After
fledging, juvenile birds often disperse further than adults,
and to different areas, so are commonly sighted far from a
species' normal range. Some species, such as the auks, do
not have a concerted migration effort, but drift southwards
as the winter approaches.[15] Other species, such as some of
the storm-petrels, diving petrels and
cormorants, never disperse at all, staying near their
breeding colonies year round.
Away from the sea
Whilst the definition of seabirds suggests that the birds
in question spend their lives on the ocean, many seabird
families have many species that spend some or even most of
their lives inland away from the sea. Most strikingly, many
species breed many tens, hundreds or even thousands of miles
inland. Some of these species still return to the ocean to
feed; for example, the Snow Petrel, the nests of which have
been found 300 miles inland on the Antarctic mainland, are
unlikely to find anything to eat around their breeding
sites.[42] The Marbled Murrelet nests inland in old growth
forest, seeking huge conifers with large branches to nest
on.[43] Other species, such as the California Gull, nest and
feed inland on lakes, and then move to the coasts in the
winter.[44] Some cormorant, pelican, gull and tern species
have individuals that never visit the sea at all, spending
their lives on lakes, rivers, swamps and, in the case of
some of the gulls, cities and agricultural land. In these
cases it is thought that these terrestrial or freshwater
birds evolved from marine ancestors.[7] Some seabirds,
principally those that nest in tundra-like skuas and phalaropes, will migrate over land
as well.
The more marine species, such as
petrels, auks, and gannets, are more restricted in their
habits, but are occasionally seen inland as vagrants. This
most commonly happens to young inexperienced birds, but can
happen in great numbers to exhausted adults after large
storms, an event known as a wreck,[45] where they provide
prized sightings for birders.
Relationship with humans
Seabirds and fisheries
Seabirds have had a long association with both fisheries
and sailors, and both have drawn benefits and disadvantages
from the relationship.
Fishermen have traditionally used seabirds as indicators
of both fish shoals,[22] underwater banks that might
indicate fish stocks, and of potential landfall. In fact,
the known association of seabirds with land was instrumental
in allowing the Polynesians to locate tiny landmasses in the
Pacific.[1] Seabirds have provided food for fishermen away
from home, as well as bait. Famously, tethered cormorants
have been used to catch fish directly. Indirectly, fisheries
have also benefited from guano from colonies of seabirds
acting as fertiliser for the surrounding seas.
Negative effects on fisheries are mostly restricted to
raiding by birds on aquaculture,[46] although long-lining
fisheries also have to deal with bait stealing. There have
been claims of prey depletion by seabirds of fishery stocks,
and while there is some evidence of this, the effects of
seabirds are considered smaller than that of marine mammals
and predatory fish (like tuna).[1]
Seabirds (mostly Northern Fulmars) flocking at a
long-lining vessel.
Some seabird species have benefited from fisheries,
particularly from discarded fish and
offal. These discards compose 30% of the food of seabirds in
the North Sea, for example, and compose up to 70% of the
total food of some seabird populations.[47] This can have
other impacts; for example, the spread of the Northern
Fulmar through the British Isles is attributed in part to
the availability of discards.[48] Discards generally benefit
surface feeders, such as gannets and petrels, to the detriment of pursuit divers like
penguins.
Fisheries also have negative effects on seabirds, and
these effects, particularly on the long-lived and
slow-breeding
albatrosses, are a source of increasing concern to
conservationists. The bycatch of seabirds entangled in nets
or hooked on fishing lines has had a big impact on seabird
numbers; for example, an estimated 100,000 albatrosses are
hooked and drown each year on tuna lines set out by
long-line fisheries.[49] [50] Overall, many hundreds of
thousands of birds are trapped and killed each year, a
source of concern for some of the rarest species (for
example, only 1,000 Short-tailed Albatrosses are known to still exist).
Seabirds are also thought to suffer when overfishing occurs.
Exploitation
The
hunting of seabirds and the collecting of seabird eggs have
contributed to the declines of many species, and the
extinction of several, including the Great Auk and the
Spectacled Cormorant. Seabirds have been hunted for food by
coastal peoples throughout history—one of the earliest
instances known is in southern Chile, where archaeological
excavations in middens has shown hunting of albatrosses,
cormorants and shearwaters from 5000 BP.[51] This pressure
has led to some species becoming extinct in many places; in
particular, at least 20 species of an original 29 no longer
breed on Easter Island. In the 19th century, the hunting of
seabirds for fat deposits and feathers for the millinery
trade reached industrial levels. Muttonbirding (harvesting
shearwater chicks) developed as important industries in both
New Zealand and Tasmania, and the name of one species, the
Providence Petrel, is derived from its seemingly miraculous
arrival on Norfolk Island where it provided a windfall for
starving European settlers.[52] In the Falkland Islands,
hundreds of thousands of penguins were harvested for their
oil each year. Seabird eggs have also long been an important
source of food for sailors undertaking long sea voyages, as
well as being taken when settlements grow in areas near a
colony. Eggers from San Francisco took almost half a million
eggs a year from the Farallon Islands in the mid-19th century, a period in
the islands' history from which the seabird species are
still recovering.[53]
Both hunting and egging continue today, although not at
the levels that occurred in the past, and generally in a
more controlled manner. For example, the Māori of Stewart
Island/Rakiura continue to harvest the chicks of the Sooty
Shearwater as they have done for centuries, using
traditional methods (called kaitiakitanga) to manage the
harvest, but now work with the University of Otago in
studying the populations. In Greenland, however, uncontrolled hunting is pushing many
species into steep decline.[54]
Other threats
Other human factors have led to declines and even
extinctions in seabird populations, colonies and species. Of
these, perhaps the most serious are
introduced species. Seabirds, breeding predominantly on
small isolated islands, have lost many predator defence
behaviours.[37] Feral cats are capable of taking seabirds as
large as albatrosses, and many introduced rodents, such as
the Pacific rat, can take eggs hidden in burrows. Introduced
goats, cattle, rabbits and other herbivores can lead to
problems, particularly when species need vegetation to
protect or shade their young.[55] Disturbance of breeding
colonies by humans is often a problem as well—visitors, even
well-meaning tourists, can flush brooding adults off a colony leaving
chicks and eggs vulnerable to predators.
This Crested Auklet was oiled in Alaska during
the M/V Selendang Ayu spill of 2004.
The build-up of toxins and pollutants in seabirds is also
a concern. Seabirds, being apex predators, suffered from the
ravages of DDT until it was banned; among other effects, DDT
was implicated in embryo development problems and the skewed
sex ratio of Western Gulls in southern California.[56] Oil
spills are also a threat to seabird species, as both
a toxin and because the
feathers of the birds become saturated by the oil,
causing them to lose their waterproofing.[57]
Oil pollution threatens species with restricted ranges or
already depressed populations.
Conservation
The threats faced by seabirds have not gone unnoticed by
scientists or the
conservation movement. As early as 1903, Theodore Roosevelt
was convinced of the need to declare Pelican Island in
Florida a National Wildlife Refuge to protect the bird
colonies (including the nesting Brown Pelicans),[58] and in
1909 he protected the Farallon Islands. Today many important
seabird colonies are given some measure of protection, from
Heron Island in Australia to Triangle Island in British
Columbia.
Island restoration techniques, pioneered by New Zealand,
enable the removal of exotic invaders from increasingly
large islands. Feral cats have been removed from Ascension
Island, Arctic Foxes from many islands in the Aleutians,[59]
and rats from Campbell Island. The removal of these introduced species
has led to increases in numbers of species under pressure
and even the return of extirpated ones. After the removal of
cats from Ascension Island, seabirds began to nest there
again for the first time in over a hundred years.[60]
Seabird mortality caused by long-line fisheries can be
massively reduced by techniques such as setting long-line
bait at night, dying the bait blue, setting the bait
underwater, increasing the amount of weight on lines and by
using bird scarers,[61]
and their deployment is increasingly required by many
national fishing fleets. The international ban on the use of
drift nets has also helped reduce the mortality of
seabirds and other marine wildlife.
One of the Millennium Projects in the UK was the
Scottish Seabird Centre, near the important bird sanctuaries
on Bass Rock, Fidra and the surrounding islands. The area is
home to huge colonies of gannets, puffins, skuas and other
seabirds. The centre allows visitors to watch live video
from the islands as well as learn about the threats the
birds face and how we can protect them, and has helped to
significantly raise the profile of seabird conservation in
the UK. Seabird tourism can provide income for costal
communities as well as raise the profile of seabird
conservation, for example the Northern Royal Albatross
colony at Taiaroa Head in New Zealand attracts 40,000 visitors a
year.[14]
The plight of albatross and large seabirds, as well as
other marine creatures, being taken as bycatch by long-line
fisheries, has been addressed by a large number of NGOs
(including BirdLife International and the RSPB). This led to
the Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and
Petrels, a legally binding treaty designed to protect these
threatened species, which has been ratified by eight
countries as of 2006 (namely Australia, Ecuador, France, New
Zealand, Peru, South Africa, Spain, and the United Kingdom).[62]
Role in culture
A relief depicting a mother pelican bleeding to
feed her chicks.
Many seabirds are little studied and poorly known, due to
living far out to sea and breeding in isolated colonies.
Some seabirds have made the break into popular
consciousness, most particularly, the
albatrosses and
gulls. The albatrosses have been described as "the most
legendary of birds",[63]
and have a variety of
myths and legends associated with them, and today it is
widely considered unlucky to harm them, although the notion
that sailors believed that is a myth.[64] This myth derives
from Samuel Taylor Coleridge's famous poem, "The Rime of the
Ancient Mariner", where a sailor is punished for harming an
albatross by wearing the dead bird around his neck. Sailors
did, however, consider it unlucky to touch a storm-petrel, especially one that has landed on the
ship.[63]
Gulls are one of the most commonly seen seabirds, given
their use of human-made habitats (such as cities and dumps)
and their often fearless nature. They therefore also have
made it into the popular consciousness, if only as the
"flying rats" berated in Finding Nemo. They have been used
metaphorically, as in Jonathan Livingston Seagull, by
Richard Bach, or to denote a closeness to the sea, such as
their use in the The Lord of the Rings, both in the insignia
of Gondor, and therefore Númenor (used in the design of the
film), and to call Legolas to, and across, the sea. Other
species have also made an impact; pelicans have long been
associated with mercy and altruism because of an early
Western Christian myth that they split open their breast to feed
their starving chicks.[19]
Seabird families
The following are the groups of
birds normally classed as seabirds.
Sphenisciformes (Antarctic and southern waters; 16
species)
^
abcdefghijkl
Schreiber, Elizabeth A. & Burger, Joanne.(2001.)
Biology of Marine Birds, Boca Raton:CRC Press,
ISBN 0-8493-9882-7
^
Johansson LC, Lindhe Norberg UM. (2001) "Lift-based
paddling in diving grebe." J Exp Biol.204(10) :1687-96.[1]
^
Gregory, J. (1952) "The Jaws of the Cretaceous
Toothed Birds, Ichthyornis and Hesperornis"
Condor54(2): 73-88
[2]
^
Goedert, J. (1989) "Giant Late Eocene Marine Birds
(Pelecaniformes: Pelagornithidae) from Northwestern
Oregon" Journal of Paleontology, 63(6)
939-944
^
Possibly due to comparatively close (in astronomical
terms - c.150
lightyears) supernova activity
^
Olson, S. & Hasegawa, Y. (1979)"Fossil Counterparts
of Giant Penguins from the North Pacific"
Science206(4419): 688-689.
^
abcd
Gaston, Anthony J. (2004). Seabirds: A Natural
History New Haven:Yale University Press,
ISBN 0-300-10406-5
^
Pennycuick, C. J. (1982). "The flight of petrels and
albatrosses (Procellariiformes), observed in South
Georgia and its vicinity". Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society of London B
300: 75–106.
^
Lequette, B., Verheyden, C., Jowentin, P. (1989)
"Olfaction in Subantarctic seabirds: Its
phylogenetic and ecological significance" The
Condor91: 732-135.
[3]
^ Harrison,
C. S. (1990) Seabirds of Hawaii, Natural History
and Conservation Ithica:Cornell University
Press,
ISBN 0-8014-2449-6
^
Grémillet, D, Chauvin, C, Wilson, R.P., Le Maho, Y.
& Wanless, S. (2005) Unusual feather structure
allows partial plumage wettability in diving great
cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo." Journal
of Avian Biology36(1): 57-63.
^
Withers, P.C (1979) "Aerodynamics and Hydrodynamics
of the ‘Hovering’ Flight of Wilson'S Storm Petrel"
Journal of Experimental Biology80:
83-91[4]
^
Metz, V. G., and E. A. Schreiber. 2002. Great
Frigatebird (Fregata minor). In The Birds
of North America, No. 681 (A. Poole and
F. Gill, eds.). The Birds of North America, Inc.,
Philadelphia, PA.
^
abcd
Brooke, M. (2004). Albatrosses And Petrels Across
The World Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
ISBN 0-19-850125-0
^ abc
Gaston, Anthony J. & Jones, Ian L. (1998). The
Auks Oxford:Oxford University Press,
ISBN 0-19-854032-9
^
Weimerskirch, H., Cherel, Y., (1998) Feeding ecology
of short-tailed shearwaters: breeding in Tasmania
and foraging in the Antarctic? Marine Ecology
Progress Series167: 261-274
^
Ropert-Coudert Y., Grémillet D., Ryan P., Kato A.,
Naito Y. & Le Maho Y. (2004) " Between air and
water: the plunge dive of the Cape Gannet Morus
capensis" Ibis146(2): 281-290
^
ab
Elliot, A. (1992) "Family Pelecanidae (Pelicans)" in
Handbook of Birds of the World Vol 1.
Barcelona:Lynx Editions,
ISBN 84-87334-10-5
^
Ainley, D.G. (1977) "Feeding methods in seabirds: a
comparison of polar and tropical nesting communities
in the eastern Pacific Ocean". In: Llano, G.A.
(Ed.). Adaptations within Antarctic ecosystems.
Smithsonian Inst. Washington D.C. P 669-685.
^
Haney, J.C. & Stone, A.E. (1988) "Seabird foraging
tactics and water clarity: Are plunge divers really
in the clear?" Marine Ecology Progress Series49 1-9
^ ab
Au, D.W.K. & Pitman, R.L. (1986) Seabird
interactions with Dolphins and Tuna in the Eastern
Tropical Pacific. Condor, 88: 304-317.
[5]
^
Schnell, G., Woods, B & Ploger B (1983) "Brown
Pelican foraging success and kleptoparasitism by
Laughing Gulls" Auk100:636-644
^
Gaston, A. J., and S. B. C. Dechesne. (1996).
Rhinoceros Auklet (Cerorhinca monocerata). In
The Birds of North America, No. 212 (A. Poole
and F. Gill, eds.). The Academy of Natural Sciences,
Philadelphia, PA, and The American Ornithologists’
Union, Washington, D.C.
^
Vickery, J & Brooke, M. (1994) "The Kleptoparasitic
Interactions between Great Frigatebirds and Masked
Boobies on Henderson Island, South Pacific "
Condor96: 331-340
^
Croxall, J.P. & Prince, P.A. (1994). "Dead or alive,
night or day: how do albatrosses catch squid?"
Antarctic Science6: 155–162.
^
Punta, G, Herrera, G. (1995) "Predation by Southern
Giant Petrels Macronectes giganteus on adult
Imperial Cormorants Phalacrocorax atriceps"
Marine Ornithology23 166-167
[6]
^
Robertson, C.J.R. (1993). "Survival and longevity of
the Northern Royal Albatross Diomedea epomophora
sanfordi at Taiaroa Head" 1937-93. Emu
93: 269-276.
^
Manuwal, D. A. and A. C. Thoresen. 1993. Cassin’s
Auklet (Ptychoramphus aleuticus). In The
Birds of North America, No. 50 (A. Poole and F.
Gill, Eds.). Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural
Sciences; Washington, D.C.: The American
Ornithologists’ Union.
^
Metz, V.G. & Schreiber, E.A. (2002) "Great
Frigatebird (Fregata minor)" In The Birds
of North America, No 681, (Poole, A. & Gill, F.,
eds) The Birds of North America Inc:Philadelphia
^
Pickering, S.P.C., & Berrow, S.D., (2001) "Courtship
behaviour of the Wandering Albatross Diomedea
exulans at Bird Island, South Georgia" Marine
Ornithology29: 29-37
[7]
^
Schreiber, E. A., C. J. Feare, B. A. Harrington, B.
G. Murray, Jr., W. B. Robertson, Jr., M. J.
Robertson, and G. E. Woolfenden. 2002. Sooty Tern (Sterna
fuscata). In The Birds of North America,
No. 665 (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The
Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA.
^
Seto, N. W. H., and D. O’Daniel. (1999) Bonin Petrel
(Pterodroma hypoleuca). In The Birds of
North America, No. 385 (A. Poole and F. Gill,
eds.). The Birds of North America, Inc.,
Philadelphia, PA.
^
Bried, J.L., Pontier, D., Jouventin, P., (2003)
"Mate fidelity in monogamous birds: a re-examination
of the Procellariiformes" Animal Behaviour
65: 235–246
[8]
^
Fisher, H.I., (1976) "Some dynamics of a breeding
colony of Laysan Albatrosses. Wilson Bulletin88: 121-142.
^
Rabouam, C., Thibault, J.-C., Bretagnole, V., (1998)
"Natal Philopatry and Close Inbreeding in Cory's
Shearwater (Calonectris diomedea)" Auk115(2): 483-486
[9]
^ ab
Moors, P.J.; Atkinson, I.A.E. (1984). Predation
on seabirds by introduced animals, and factors
affecting its severity.. In Status and
Conservation of the World's Seabirds. Cambridge:
ICBP.
ISBN 0-946888-03-5.
^
Burness, G. P., K. Lefevre, and C. T. Collins. 1999.
Elegant Tern (Sterna elegans). In The
Birds of North America, No. 404 (A. Poole
and F. Gill, eds.). The Birds of North America,
Inc., Philadelphia, PA.
^
Shaffer S.A., Tremblay Y., Weimerskirch H., Scott
D., Thompson D.R., Sagar P.M., Moller H., Taylor
G.A., Foley D.G., Block B.A., Costa D.P. (2006)
"Migratory shearwaters integrate oceanic resources
across the Pacific Ocean in an endless summer."
Proc Natl Acad Sci.103(34): 12799-12802
^
Oro, D., Cam, E., Pradel, R. & Martinetz-Abrain, A.
(2004) "Influence of food availability on demography
and local population dynamics in a long-lived
seabird" Proc. R. Soc. London B.271:387-396
^
Croxall, J, Steele, W., McInnes, S, Prince, P.
(1995)"Breeding Distribution of Snow Petrel
Pagodroma nivea" Marine Ornithology23
69-99
[11]
^
Nelson, S. K. 1997. Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus
marmoratus). In The Birds of North America,
No. 276 (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Academy of
Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and The American
Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, D.C.
^
Winkler, D. W. 1996. California Gull (Larus
californicus). In The Birds of North America,
No. 259 (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Academy of
Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and The American
Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, D.C.
^
Harris, M. & Wanless, S., (1996) "Differential
responses of Guillemot Uria aalge and Shag
Phalacrocorax aristotelis to a late winter
wreck" Bird Study43(2): 220-230
^
Collis, K., Adamany, S. - Columbia River
Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, Roby, D.D., Craig,
D.P., Lyons, D.E., - Oregon Cooperative Fish and
Wildlife Research Unit, (2000), "Avian Predation on
Juvenile Salmonids in the Lower Columbia River",
1998 Annual Report to Bonneville Power
Administration, Portland, OR,[12]
^
Oro, D., Ruiz, X., Pedrocchi, V. & Gonzalez-Solis,
J. (1997) "Diet and adult time budgets of Audouin's
Gull Larus audouinii in response to changes
in commercial fisheries" Ibis139:
631-637
^
Thompson, P.M., (2004) "Identifying drivers of
change; did fisheries play a role in the spread of
North Atlantic fulmars?" in Management of marine
ecosystems: monitoring change in upper trophic
levels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
[13]
^
Brothers NP. 1991. "Albatross mortality and
associated bait loss in the Japanese longline
fishery in the southern ocean." Biological
Conservation55: 255-268.
^
Simeone, A. & Navarro, X. (2002) "Human exploitation
of seabirds in coastal southern Chile during the
mid-Holocene" Rev. chil. hist. nat75(2):
423-431
[14]
^ Anderson,
A. (1996) "Origins of Procellariidae Hunting in the
Southwest Pacific" International Journal of
Osteoarcheology6: 403-410
^
White, Peter; (1995), The Farallon Islands,
Sentinels of the Golden Gate, Scottwall
Associates:San Francisco,
ISBN 0-942087-10-0
^
Burnham, W., Burnham, K.K., Cade, T.J., (2005) "Past
and present assessments of bird life in Uummannaq
District, West Greenland" Dansk Orn. Foren.
Tidsskr.99: 196-208
[15]
^
Carlile, N., Proiddel, D., Zino, F., Natividad, C. &
Wingate, D.B. (2003) "A review of four successful
recovery programmes for threatened sub-tropical
petrels" Marine Ornithology31:
185-192
^
Fry, D. & Toone, C. (1981) "DDT-induced feminization
of gull embryos" Science213(4510):
922-924
^
Dunnet, G., Crisp, D., Conan, G., Bourne, W. (1982)
"Oil Pollution and Seabird Populations [and
Discussion]" Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society of London. B297(1087):
413-427
^
Williams, J.C., Byrd G.V.& Konyukhov, N.B. (2003)
Whiskered Auklets Aethia pygmaea, foxes,
humans and how to right a wrong. 'Marine
Ornithology 31: 175-180
[16]
^
Food and Agriculture Organisation (1999) "The
incidental catch of seabirds by longline fisheries:
worldwide review and technical guidelines for
mitigation. FAO Fisheries Circular No.937. Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,
Rome.
[17]